Hi Jesper,
I have implemented your suggestion.
/Jesper
On 10/22/2012 10:56 AM, Jesper Mattsson wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> One traversal method that I feel is lacking is getNumXNoTransform()
> for a list X*. Using getNumX() will (with good reason) trigger a
> rewrite of the entire list. This would probably be clearer to the user
> if there was a NoTransform version. Currently you need to do
> getXListNoTransform().getNumChildNoTransform() to get the number of
> X:es without rewrites.
>
> Jesper
>
> *Jesper MATTSSON, MSc*
>
> Software Developer & IT Administrator
>
> Phone direct: +46 73 324 5909
>
> Email: jesper.mattsson_at_modelon.com <mailto:jesper.mattsson_at_modelon.com>
>
>
> Description: Description: Modelon_2011_Gradient_RGB_400
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Modelon AB
> Ideon Science Park
> SE-223 70 Lund, Sweden
>
>
>
> Phone: +46 46 286 2200
> Fax: +46 46 286 2201
>
>
>
>
> Web: http://www.modelon.com <http://www.modelon.com/>
>
> This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be confidential
> and/or privileged. If you are not one of the named recipients or have
> received this email in error, (i) you should not read, disclose, or
> copy it, (ii) please notify sender of your receipt by reply email and
> delete this email and all attachments, (iii) Modelon does not accept
> or assume any liability or responsibility for any use of or reliance
> on this email.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> JastAdd mailing list
> JastAdd_at_cs.lth.se
> https://mail1.cs.lth.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/jastadd
Received on Thu Oct 25 2012 - 14:42:32 CEST